Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: I got a reply


Permanent Vacation



Status: Offline
Posts: 23086
Date:
I got a reply


And he totally blew me off.  Gee, thanks Dick!  I'm glad I didn't vote for him.  I plan to email him back and clarify what "performance" means. 

-----

Dear Ms. Hartz:

 

Thank you for contacting me.  I appreciate your sharing your concerns regarding a proposed increase in the royalty fees paid by Internet radio businesses.

 

On March 2, 2007, the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board of the Library of Congress announced its decision to increase the royalty fees to be paid by Internet radio stations for streaming music during the years of 2006-2010.  The rates set by the Board for commercial webcasters, including broadcasters retransmitting their over-the-air signals on the Internet, are as follows:


I.                                                                   2006 - $.0008 per performance

II.                2007 - $.0011 per performance

III.             2008 - $.0014 per performance

IV.             2009 - $.0018 per performance

V.                2010 - $.0019 per performance

The minimum fee is $500 per channel per year.  For noncommercial webcasters, the fee will be $500 per channel, for up to 159,140 Aggregate Tuning Hours (one listener listening for an hour) per month.  Noncommercial webcasters who exceed that level pay at the commercial rate for all listening in excess of that limit.

 

This decision is subject to a variety of appeals, including pending requests for a rehearing of the entire matter. Legal appeals are also a distinct possibility.

 

Under copyright law, owners of sound recordings must license their music for noninteractive webcasts and simulcasts.  Webcasters and broadcasters may negotiate an individual rate directly with copyright owners or they may obtain the statutory compulsory license from the government-designated agency SoundExchange at a set rate.  SoundExchange must pay 50% of the royalties to the copyright owners (typically labels), 45% to featured artists and 5% to a union fund set up to pay background musicians and singers.

 

Much has changed since Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996.  As new technologies have taken off, each has put strains on the web of regulations originated more than a decade ago.  Many observers expect these regulations to be overhauled during the 110th Congress.

 

A number of ideas are already circulating on Capitol Hill in anticipation of this effort, including proposals that would revise the intellectual property laws governing music broadcast over the Internet.  As Congress continues to review these proposals, I will keep your thoughts in mind.

 

            Again, thank you for contacting me.  Knowing your concerns is helpful to me.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

Richard G. Lugar

United States Senator




__________________

tumblr_maefr2j2Bt1rrd8d6o1_500.gif

 



Darth Raydar

Status: Offline
Posts: 3798
Date:

Hee Hee.  Mz Hartz got "dicked" weirdfacewinkdohconfusedevileyeblehashamedcryhmmfurious

__________________


Permanent Vacation



Status: Offline
Posts: 23086
Date:



__________________

tumblr_maefr2j2Bt1rrd8d6o1_500.gif

 



Grand Poobah

    



Status: Offline
Posts: 36897
Date:

I think the senators all have a standard pre-typed reply that they all use...hmm

__________________
"And like Web, I enjoy throwing JR under the bus.  Problem is, it's usually under the special bus that I ride every day". Ghostdancer 12-18-09


Permanent Vacation



Status: Offline
Posts: 23086
Date:

I got another reply.  And I did vote for this guy.  I think I voted wisely...
--------------

April 10, 2007

Dear Ms. Hartz,

 

           Thank you for contacting me regarding the Copyright Royalty Board's (CRB) March 2nd decision which would effectively raise copyright royalties paid to rights holders by 30 percent for four years. This means that all parties, including Internet radio stations, would have to increase the fees they pay to recording artists and other music rights holders. I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue.

 

           The Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, of which I am a member, will likely hold hearings on this issue to evaluate how the CRB reached its decision and decide if it is fair to all parties involved. It is not my intention to condone any action that would eliminate Internet radio stations, and I will continue to keep an eye on this situation.

 

           Thank you again for writing. Please do not hesitate to call me at 202.225.5315 if I can assist you in the future on this or any other issue. If you would like to receive periodic updates on my Congressional activities, please visit http://baronhill.house.gov.



__________________

tumblr_maefr2j2Bt1rrd8d6o1_500.gif

 



Grand Poobah

    



Status: Offline
Posts: 36897
Date:

hey thats great!smile

__________________
"And like Web, I enjoy throwing JR under the bus.  Problem is, it's usually under the special bus that I ride every day". Ghostdancer 12-18-09


Lord of Linguists

Status: Offline
Posts: 3527
Date:

Way to go

__________________

            FREE WILLY !!!  headbang.gif



The Chosen Woo

Status: Offline
Posts: 21048
Date:

I have not received any response. My friend Angy got a personalized letter back that she just showed me. It had corrections on it and his signature. However he talked in such circles I don't think he was with us. He pretty much stated back to us what we already know. Oh and I had to laugh at his closing line: I work for you! 
Yeah, so what are ya gonna do for me?!!



__________________
"Am I speaking in a language you're not getting here?"


Doesn't Do Windows



Status: Offline
Posts: 25589
Date:


I got a form letter reply too that basically told me what I had just told him with a "I'll keep an eye on this situation" kind of close.



__________________




The Chosen Woo

Status: Offline
Posts: 21048
Date:

I got an outdated standard form response today.

Thank you . . .

 

. . . for contacting me about the copyright royalties that Internet radio stations must pay in order to broadcast music online. I understand your concern that a recent court ruling to raise these royalty fees will force many Internet radio stations to shut down.

 

On March 2, a panel of copyright judges changed how the amount of these fees is calculated. Previously, small broadcasters could pay royalties as a percentage-usually about 12 percent-of the money they collected. The new calculation requires all online music broadcasters to pay royalties on a per-listener, per-hour basis and increases royalty rates.

 

A coalition of online broadcasters is currently in the process of appealing this ruling. I will monitor the situation as this appeal moves forward. Should legislation come before me in the Senate, I will be sure to keep your views in mind.

 

Thank you again for contacting me. Please feel free to do so again if I can be of assistance to you in the future.

 

Sincerely,

Debbie Stabenow

United States Senator



__________________
"Am I speaking in a language you're not getting here?"
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard