As someone who has studied the art of writing to a degree, I know you hate to see people butcher it.
I am growing more and more frustrated at what passes for journalism these days.
This article from MSNBC was almost impossible to read because it felt like nothing more than ignorant babble most of the time. Not to mention the grammatical errors throughout it. Many I'm sure are typos, but whatever happened to proof reading?
PS. I realize parts of the article are INTENTIONALLY using slang, but the entire thing suggests to me this person isn't much of a journalist.
------------
OMG! YR still on MySpace? Loser!
As the social networking site gets the boot, there are lessons to be learned
By Helen A.S. Popkin
Updated: 5:45 a.m. CT July 13, 2007
function UpdateTimeStamp(pdt) { var n = document.getElementById("udtD"); if(pdt != '' && n && window.DateTime) { var dt = new DateTime(); pdt = dt.T2D(pdt); if(dt.GetTZ(pdt)) {n.innerHTML = dt.D2S(pdt,(('false'.toLowerCase()=='false')?false:true));} } } UpdateTimeStamp('633199203091730000');
The kids are ditching MySpace for Facebook. According to the latest numbers from comScore Media Metrix, U.S. MySpace visitors under 18 dropped 30 percent over the past year, while Facebook's nearly tripled.
Why the exodus?
Is it simply the fickle nature of teens? Is it because Facebook, with its ties to real-world school affiliations, seems safer? Or could it be that average American teenagers dont want to be labeled like this:
Latino/Hispanic teens, immigrant teens, "burnouts," "alternative kids," "art fags," punks, emos, goths, gangstas, queer kids, and other kids who didn't play into the dominant high school popularity paradigm. (sic)
Thats how UC Berkeley researcher danah boyd (lowercase is how she legally spells it) described teen MySpace users in her blog essay Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace, which exploded all over the Internet last month. She also wrote that the goodie two shoes, jocks, athletes, or other 'good' kids are now going to Facebook.
Many a blog fly had a real problem with the way boyd addressed race and class, not to mention her arguably shaky methodology and grammar. (Then again, when doesn't a blog fly all-cap insult anything high on the Digg/ del.icio.us/ Slashdot charts?)
As happens on the InterWeb, things spun horribly out of control. The BBC reported boyds essay as a study, implying sciencey goodness despite boyds numerous caveats indicating other wise.
The Uber Blog Geeks launched into a full-on blog war (as Uber Blog Geeks are wont to do) shooting invectives from their various sides and opinions.
I'm still floored by the responses, boyd wrote in a follow-up blog, and her surprise is perhaps the most controversial statement shes made so far. As a PhD candidate and social network researcher, boyd should have figured out by now how the Internet works. It works like this:
On the Internet, everything you post is your final draft. Like boyds essay, it doesnt matter how many caveats you place in italics, stating stuff like, I wish I could just put numbers in front of it all and be done with it, but instead, I'm going to face the stickiness and see if I can get my thoughts across.Upload your ideas into cyberspace, and you might as well buy that essay an engagement ring its yours forever. Hmmmmmaybe kids are finally figuring out that important truth and thats why theyre emigrating from MySpace to Facebook. MySpace is way ugly and unorganized. Even politicians cant get it right. Who wants that albatross?
On the Internet, everything is out of context. Nobody reads the Internet for comprehension. Whatever you post, people will decide what it says before they read it. And even if they do read it, theyll only take away what they want to take away. Its not theyre fault. Theyre at work, where theyre supposed to be working, not surfing the Web. They only have so much time to find something appropriate to which they can add their all-cap insult. Speaking of comment sections, thats another reason kids are leaving MySpace. THNX 4 THE AD!!! has grown hollow and meaningless. Also, nobody wants to hear your stupid band.
Geeks love to blog fight. Before danah boyds essay, it was Twitter. Or Digg. Or Google taking over the universe. Though its actually very impressive that boyds essay took focus off Steve Jobs and the iPhone, if only for a nanosecond.
Accelerating name recognition is an Internet specialty. Raise your hand if you heard of danah boyd one month ago. Then you too are a geek and/or blog fly.
Journalists are lazy. At least some of them, hence the BBCs overblown reference to boyds essay. Meanwhile, according to this comScore press release Im looking at, half the users on MySpace are 35 or older. Wow, that sure explains a lot. What teen wants to hang out online with the parents?