Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The future of internet radio?


Permanent Vacation



Status: Offline
Posts: 23086
Date:
The future of internet radio?


Is there any new news on the whole royalty ruling thing that we fought earlier?  JR, have you heard anything?

I've seen a few articles today, but they all seem to be based on one article by the Washington Post about Pandora.  But it doesn't tell me any concrete facts.  Do we have to worry again, or is someone recycling old news?

Anything?  Anyone?

__________________

tumblr_maefr2j2Bt1rrd8d6o1_500.gif

 



2011 Super Bowl Champions!

Status: Offline
Posts: 29950
Date:

I haven't heard anything MZ.

I'll have to check out that one site that was devoted to it, I think it was called uphillbattle.com or .org.  They'll probably have some info.

__________________


Permanent Vacation



Status: Offline
Posts: 23086
Date:

Yeah, I can't remember any of the websites either. But if we are going to have to do battle again, I can't believe we're not hearing more about it.

__________________

tumblr_maefr2j2Bt1rrd8d6o1_500.gif

 



Permanent Vacation



Status: Offline
Posts: 23086
Date:

Well, I checked SaveNetRadio.org, and their last news story was from July about a benefit concert, and one from November before that.

__________________

tumblr_maefr2j2Bt1rrd8d6o1_500.gif

 



2011 Super Bowl Champions!

Status: Offline
Posts: 29950
Date:

I think a lot of people are resigned to the fact we're not going to win this one. I know I am.

In the end the labels will get their way. And you know what? Since I claim myself a Republican I should probably accept that and see how it plays out.

I don't believe the government should step in and decide how the entertainment business runs itself. I was hoping they'd save our butts, but really, it's a free market and I believe in free markets.

If the labels think that destroying internet radio is going to help their bottom line more power to them. I think they're COMPLETELY wrong. I think just like they bungled the whole digital downloading thing they'll bungle this and put one more nail in their own coffin.

To this day I still can't get over how they wasted millions, maybe billions trying to fight Napster, trying to come up with DRM programs, instead of investing in an industry wide download option at FAIR prices.

Instead when they finally rolled out their own lame attempts at downloading they were crappy, clunky services that charged up to $3 per download. They failed miserably and were forced to accept that file sharing was never going to go away and legal downloads were going to have to be sold though a third party like iTunes, cutting into their profit margin.

In the future I think we're going to see more and more artists signing with small start up labels that encourage internet airplay.

I'm sick of battling with an industry as stupid and old fashioned as the record industry. If they want to hang themselves, let's give em' the rope. hmm.gif

__________________


2011 Super Bowl Champions!

Status: Offline
Posts: 29950
Date:

MzHartz wrote:

Well, I checked SaveNetRadio.org, and their last news story was from July about a benefit concert, and one from November before that.




I really do think the whole thing has just lost it's steam.  The industry was probably counting on that all along.



__________________


Permanent Vacation



Status: Offline
Posts: 23086
Date:

I just checked Pandora, and no news on there either. I really think that's just a recycled story that's gotten picked up.

I agree that the whole thing has gone stale, but I'm an optimist and think that we'll win in the end. We're in another internet boom, and FREE is key this time. MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, Skype, YouTube, Hulu, Blogger, most of the Google stuff (Picasa, Google Docs, iGoogle, Gmail), all free. I really do think the trends and odds are stacked against the RIAA.

I'm all for free market, but I don't think that's the case here. If it was only the artists who signed with that label that we had to pay royalties for, then maybe. But this isn't for the artist to choose, someone who they have never made any agreement with is charging people, and is *supposed to* be giving that money to the artists.

__________________

tumblr_maefr2j2Bt1rrd8d6o1_500.gif

 



2011 Super Bowl Champions!

Status: Offline
Posts: 29950
Date:

That's the most frustrating part. They stand behind the artists and say it's about getting them more money, but many, MANY artists have come forward and said they don't see but a tiny fraction of it all.

It's just going to the greedy record companies.

__________________


Permanent Vacation



Status: Offline
Posts: 23086
Date:

In a way, this whole scare has been a very educational experience for me. I didn't understand how artists got paid before.

__________________

tumblr_maefr2j2Bt1rrd8d6o1_500.gif

 

CP


Lord of the Lair

Status: Offline
Posts: 4763
Date:

I will never figure out why big business continues to shoot itself in the foot by irritating the consumer that actually helps them the most.


__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard