This might be pushing it, but I think this topic is very interesting and should get some good conversation going.
I read this and see several issues and points. I guess the main being that I think she should remain jobless. She knew that getting pregnant was reason for termination. There is no gray in this area. She agreed to take the job with that stipulation. I see her reasoning about the disadvantage that men are at- they will not get pregnant. But if one was found to be a father out of wedlock, then fire him too. Not every person that has sex gets pregnant! So maybe not 100% even, but still fair I think. The ACLU needs to butt out!
NEW YORK (AP) -- The New York Civil Liberties Union has filed a federal discrimination complaint against a Catholic school, charging that it unjustly fired an unmarried teacher for being pregnant.
"I don't understand how a religion that prides itself on forgiving and on valuing life could terminate me because I'm pregnant and choosing to have this baby," Michelle McCusker said Monday at a news conference to announce the suit.
The Diocese of Brooklyn also was named in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint.
"This is a difficult situation for every person involved, but the school had no choice but to follow the principles contained in the teachers' personnel handbook," diocese spokesman Frank DeRosa said in a news release.
The handbook says that each teacher must "convey the teachings of the Catholic faith by his or her words and actions."
Lawyers at the NYCLU, which filed the suit on McCusker's behalf, argued that administrators enforced the policy in a way that disproportionately affects women.
"The school used her pregnancy as a marker," attorney Cassandra Stubbs said. "How do they determine if male employees engage in premarital sex?"
It's not the first time the NYCLU has argued such a case. In 2003, the unmarried director of an after-school program run by a Catholic charity in Buffalo was demoted when she became pregnant. The equal employment commission found that the charity had violated federal anti-discrimination laws, the NYCLU said.
That charity agreed to ban discrimination based on marital status or pregnancy
Interesting dilema. At first I was outraged. I was not aware that it was a religious school. As it is, I support the decision to dump her, especially as the policy was clearly stated in the handbook.